I'm not very good at snooker.
I have the odd flash of genius, perhaps resulting in a break of 20 or 30, but otherwise, a game will generally consist of a slow crawl towards a final win on the pink and a score of maybe 32-25. We are shit. We know we are shit. I've been shit at it for 12 years now.

I don't need it pointed out by someone who is only marginally better. I would like to see those arses in the crucible, getting a pasting off Hendry or O'Sullivan.

My point, I think, is that I dislike the big fish in a little pond who make themselves feel important by lauding their own less than world class skill.

Being shit at something is far better when you admit it.

Yes, I am Scottish.
( baw__bag has lost his rage and rediscovered his rager, Fri 2 May 2008, 18:26, closed)

you sound like me..
my friends and I once took 1hr 20 to finish one game of snooker only to be berated by the wankers who thnink that they are absolutely amazing...twats
(Foulkesy123 The one and only..., Fri 2 May 2008, 19:16, closed)

In an odd quirk of fate
I've just played 2 of my best games ever, thumping 2 of my mates almost to the point of tears!

My highest break was still only 19 though, best ever was 35
( baw__bag has lost his rage and rediscovered his rager, Sat 3 May 2008, 3:01, closed)